4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A pilot study to modify the SF-36V physical functioning scale for use with veterans with spinal cord injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 87, Issue 8, Pages 1059-1066

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.010

Keywords

quality of life; rehabilitation; spinal cord injuries; surveys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To develop a valid and reliable spinal cord injury (SCI) specific physical functioning (PF) scale for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) version of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Design: A mixed qualitative and quantitative research design was used. In phase 1, a pool of SCI-specific PF items was generated based on focus groups with patients and health care providers. In phase 2, the psychometric properties of the SCI-specific PF scale were established. Setting: A VHA SCI center. Participants: The sample consisted of valid responses from 359 veterans with traumatic SCI who were seen at a VHA SCI center during the prior year (2002). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Physical functioning in people with SCI. Results: Exploratory factor analysis was conducted separately on respondents with lower neurologic-level injuries (paraplegia, 53% [n = 190]) and those with higher neurologic-level injuries (tetraplegia, 45% [n = 163]) and identified 9 items loading on I factor in both groups. These 9 items were included in separate item response theory (IRT) model analyses for each subgroup. Based on the IRT analysis, I item was eliminated, resulting in an 8-item, SCI-specific PF scale. Conclusions: Although several of the items in the SCI-specific PF scale showed floor effects, particularly in people with tetraplegia, we found excellent reliability and strong support of convergent and divergent validity of the scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available