4.5 Article

Effect of pexelizumab on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction or undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic overview

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 152, Issue 2, Pages 291-296

Publisher

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.03.027

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Recent trials evaluating the C5 complement inhibitor, pexelizumab, have shown that modulation of inflammation during ischemia/reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) or undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may improve clinical outcomes. Methods We performed a systematic overview of individual patient data from all completed randomized controlled trials of pexelizumab to evaluate the effect on all-cause mortality at 30 and 1 80 days after treatment. We used a random effects model and included all 5916 patients randomized in 4 clinical trials. Patients received placebo, pexelizumab bolus only or pexelizumab bolus followed by a 24-hour infusion. Results A significant reduction in mortality at 30 days was observed in patients treated with bolus plus infusion (n = 2.476) compared with placebo (n = 2492) (2.9% vs 4.2%; relative risk [RR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [0], 0.52-0.95; P =.02), with no interaction according to disease state of CABG or acute MI (P for interaction.33). A trend toward a reduction in mortality was observed in patients who received bolus plus infusion or bolus only (n = 3429) compared with placebo (n = 2476) (3.5% vs 4.2%; RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.0975; P =.215), but not in patients who received bolus only (n = 937) compared with placebo (n = 937) (5.2% vs 5.4%; RR, 0.96; 95% Cl, 0.66-1.41; P.918). The mortality benefit with bolus plus infusion compared with placebo persisted through 180 days (P =.05). Conclusions Pexelizumab reduced 30-day mortality in this systematic evaluation. Bolus plus I infusion dose is being studied in ongoing trials in acute MI and CABG populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available