4.0 Article

A Replication Study of the IRS1, CAPN10, TCF7L2, and PPARG Gene Polymorphisms Associated with Type 2 Diabetes in Two Different Populations of Mexico

Journal

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages 612-620

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2011.00668.x

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes; candidate genes; Mexican population

Funding

  1. CONACYT [SALUD-2005-C02-14412]
  2. Proyectos Estrategicos
  3. Apoyo Financiero Fundacion IMSS A. C
  4. Fundacion Gonzalo Rio Arronte I. A. P. Mexico
  5. Apoyos a la Vinculacion del Cinvestav con el Sector Salud
  6. Fundacion IMSS Scholarship, Mexico
  7. [IMSS-2004/014]
  8. [2005/2/I/363]
  9. [2006/1B/1/002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic degenerative disease that involves the participation of several genetic and environmental factors. The objective of the study was to determine the association of the IRS1 (rs1801278), CAPN10 (rs3792267), TCF7L2 (rs7903146 and rs12255372), and PPARG (rs1801282) gene polymorphisms with T2D, in two different Mexican populations. We conducted a case-control replication study in the state of Guerrero and in Mexico City, with 400 subjects from Guerrero and 1065 from Mexico City. Data were analyzed by logistic regression, adjusting by ancestry, age, gender, and BMI, to determine the association with T2D. Heterozygosity for the Gly972Arg variant of the IRS1 gene showed the strongest association for T2D in both analyzed samples (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.12-5.26 and 2.64, 95% CI 1.37-5.10, respectively). In addition, an association of two SNPs of the TCF7L2 gene with T2D was observed in both cities: rs7903146, (for Guerrero OR = 1.98 CI95% 1.02-3.89 and for Mexico OR = 1.94 CI95% 1.31-2.88) and rs12255372 (OR = 1.79 CI95% 1.08-2.97, OR = 1.78 CI95% 1.17-2.71 respectively). We suggest that our results provide strong evidence that variation in the IRS1 and TCF7L2 genes confers susceptibility to T2D in our studied populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available