4.5 Article

A rheological method to evaluate the physical stability of highly viscous pharmaceutical oil-in-water emulsions

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1937-1947

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-006-9038-x

Keywords

aging; emulsion; freeze-fracture electron microscopy; rheology; stability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. The aim of this study was to develop a rheological method to evaluate the stability of highly viscous pharmaceutical emulsions. Thereby, the time devoted to the storage tests could be reduced and manufacturers could save time in optimizing their formulations and manufacturing techniques for topical pharmaceutical forms. The influence of the type of oil and the type of emulsifier on the microstructure of the emulsions was also studied. Materials and Methods. The samples were stored at 25 and at 50 degrees C for 6 months and analysed every month using rheological as well as microscopic techniques. The size and the organization of the droplets within the emulsion were determined by freeze-fracture electron microscopy and optical contrast phase microscopy. Results. A decrease in the rheological parameters was observed for the OC emulsions (Tween/Span emulsions made with olive oil) and the Montanov emulsions. The rheological measurements showed that the structure of the OC emulsions and that of the emulsions made with the Montanov 82 emulsifier become more brittle when submitted to a shear force. The micrographs obtained by freeze-fracture electron microscopy showed that for OC only the oil droplets arrange in a network structure. Storage tests at 50 degrees C confirmed the rheological assumptions on the stability of emulsions. Conclusions. The study of the effect of shearing on the emulsions allowed quick discrimination between the emulsions according to their stabilities. The rheological tool gave information on the structure of the emulsions and on the aging process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available