4.0 Article

The TCF7L2 Diabetes Risk Variant is Associated with HbA1C Levels: a Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 471-478

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00607.x

Keywords

HbA(1C); association; TCF7L2; isolate population; diabetes; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
  2. Royal Society
  3. European Union [LSHG-CT-2006-018947]
  4. Medical Research Council UK
  5. Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia [216-1080315-0302]
  6. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/710] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U127561128] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MC_U127561128] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified around 20 common genetic variants influencing the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Likewise, a number of variants have been associated with diabetes-related quantitative glycaemic traits, but to date the overlap between these genes and variants has been low. The majority of genetic studies have focused on fasting plasma glucose levels; however, this measure is highly variable. We have conducted a GWA meta-analysis of glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1C)) levels within three healthy nondiabetic populations. This phenotype provides an estimate of mean glucose levels over 2-3 months and is a more stable predictor of future diabetes risk. Participants were from three isolated populations: the Orkney Isles in the north of Scotland, the Dalmatian islands of Vis, and Korcula in Croatia (total of 1782 nondiabetic subjects). Association was tested in each population and results combined by meta-analysis. The strongest association was with the TCF7L2 gene (rs7903146, P = 1.48 x 10-7). This is also the strongest common genetic risk factor for T2D but it has not been identified in previous genome-wide studies of glycated haemoglobin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available