4.4 Article

Sexual dimorphism in expression of receptors for bacterial lipopolysaccharides in murine macrophages: A possible mechanism for gender-based differences in endotoxic shock susceptibility

Journal

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 12-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2006.01.004

Keywords

sexual dimorphism; sepsis; monocytes/macrophages; toll-like receptor 4; CD14; inflammation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gender-based differences in the incidence and severity of bacterial sepsis render males more susceptible to septic shock than females. However, the mechanisms that underlie this sexual dimorphism remain unclear. In the present study we confirm that males produce significantly higher levels of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and the acute phase protein LPS-binding protein (LBP) than females following in vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure. It has also been verified that LPS-challenged male-derived macrophages produce higher levels of IL-1 beta and lower levels of PGE(2) than similarly treated female-derived cells. Importantly, we demonstrated that male-derived macrophages produce significantly higher levels of the inflammatory chemokine IP-10 following LPS challenge than their female counterparts. It has been demonstrated further that, although resting macrophage levels of mRNA encoding Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and its co-receptor CD 14, are not significantly different between genders, male-derived macrophages constitutively express higher levels of these proteins on their cell surface. Elevated circulating levels of LBP and constitutively higher cell surface expression of TLR4 and CD14 on macrophages in males could result in the observed sexual dimorphism in LPS-induced inflammatory mediator production and the greater susceptibility of males to bacterial sepsis. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available