4.6 Article

A phase II/III clinical study of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome)

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 465-473

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000232477.37660.fb

Keywords

Mucopolysaccharidosis II; Hunter syndrome; enzyme replacement therapy; lysosomal storage disease

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00188, M01-RR01272, RR00046, M01-RR00036] Funding Source: Medline
  2. FDA HHS [FD-R-002565-0] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of recombinant human iduronate-2-sulfatase (idursulfase) in the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis II. Methods: Ninety-six mucopolysaccharidosis II patients between 5 and 31 years of age were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to placebo infusions, weekly idursulfase (0.5 mg/kg) infusions or every-other-week infusions of idursulfase (0.5 mg/kg). Efficacy was evaluated using a composite endpoint consisting of distance walked in 6 minutes and the percentage of predicted forced vital capacity based on the sum of the ranks of change from baseline. Results: Patients in the weekly and every-other-week idursulfase groups exhibited significant improvement in the composite endpoint compared to placebo (P = 0.0049 for weekly and P = 0.0416 for every-other-week) after one year. The weekly dosing group experienced a 37-m increase in the 6-minute-walk distance (P = 0.013), a 2.7% increase in percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (P = 0.065), and a 160 mL increase in absolute forced vital capacity (P = 0.001) compared to placebo group at 53 weeks. Idursulfase was generally well tolerated, but infusion reactions did occur. Idursulfase antibodies were detected in 46.9% of patients during the study. Conclusion: This study supports the use of weekly infusions of idursulfase in the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis II.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available