4.2 Article

Research results have expiration dates: ensuring timely systematic reviews

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 454-462

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00729.x

Keywords

antiretroviral medication adherence; clinical relevance; HIV/AIDS; quantitative research; systematic reviews

Funding

  1. NINR NIH HHS [R01 NR004907-06, R01 NR004907-07, 5R01NR004907, R01 NR004907] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Time and timeliness are key issues in appraising and ensuring the clinical relevance of systematic reviews. Time considerations entering the systematic review process include the history of the clinical problem, disease, or treatment that is the target of the review, and the history of the research conducted to address it. These considerations guide: (i) formulation of the research problems and questions; (ii) setting of parameters for the search and retrieval of studies; (iii) determination of inclusion and exclusion criteria; (iv) appraisal of the clinical relevance of findings; (v) selection of the findings that will be synthesized; and (vi) interpretation of the results of that synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available