4.5 Article

Nonlinear model predictive control scheme for stabilizing annulus pressure during oil well drilling

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 719-732

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2006.01.002

Keywords

nonlinear model predictive control; pressure control; drilling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a nonlinear model predictive control scheme for stabilizing the well pressure during oil well drilling. While drilling, a fluid is pumped through the drill string and the drill bit, and is returning through the annulus between the drilled well and the drill string. Varying reservoir conditions and fluctuation in circulation flow rates cause sudden variations in the pressure conditions along the well. To compensate for these pressure fluctuations, the annulus choke valve opening can be adjusted. The proposed control scheme is based on a first-principles two-phase flow model using spatial discretization of the complete well. The optimal future choke settings are found using the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm. This control scheme is evaluated against two other control methods, a manual control scheme and a standard feed-back PI-control scheme of the choke valve with feed-forward control of the pump rates. The PI-control parameters are found using the Ziegler-Nichols closed-loop method based on simulations from a low-order model. The results show that both the PI-control scheme and the model predictive control scheme are superior to manual control. However, the PI-control scheme requires that the control parameters are re-designed when the operating conditions are deviating from the original design conditions. The model predictive control scheme will perform within the operating limits as long as the detailed model is able to describe the actual conditions of the well. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available