4.8 Article

NAFLD in children: A prospective clinical-pathological study and effect of lifestyle advice

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 458-465

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.21262

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a common cause of chronic liver disease in adults, is incompletely characterized in children. We conducted a prospective study to better characterize the clinical presentation of NAFLD in children and to determine the effect of lifestyle advice in the management of pediatric NAFLD. From June 2001 to April 2003, 84 children (age 3-18.8 yr) who had elevated aminotransferases and the diagnosis of NAFLD confirmed via liver biopsy underwent a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test and a 12-month program of lifestyle advice consisting of diet and physical exercise. Thirty-four (40.5%) patients were obese (body mass index [BMI] > 97(th) percentile), and 43 (51.2%) were overweight (BMI 85(th)-97(th) percentile). Ten (12%) had abnormal glucose tolerance; 10 (12%) had elevated triglycerides, cholesterol, or both; and all had normal blood pressure. Most children (67/84, 80%) were insulin-resistant, including the 7 children with normal BMI (< 85(th) percentile). Increased liver fibrosis was present in 49 (58.1%) patients and was independently associated with obesity (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.2) and age (1-year increase; OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.04-1-5). A 12-month program with diet and physical exercise resulted in a significant decrease in BMI, and levels of fasting glucose, insulin, lipids, and liver enzymes, as well as liver echogenicity on ultrasonography. In conclusion, children with NAFLD are almost always insulin-resistant regardless of BMI. Obesity and older age are independently associated with increased liver fibrosis. A simple lifestyle advice program significantly improves insulin resistance, and the liver disease in pediatric NAFLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available