4.5 Article

Mannose-binding lectin does not act as an acute-phase reactant in adults with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages 228-234

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03140.x

Keywords

acute phase proteins; community-acquired pneumonia; C-reactive protein; mannose-binding lectin; Streptococcus pneumoniae

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this work was to study the role of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in pneumococcal pneumonia, to determine whether MBL acts as an acute-phase reactant and whether the severity of the disease correlates with MBL levels. The study comprised 100 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. The pneumonia severity score was calculated and graded into a risk class of mortality (Fine scale). The MBL genotypes and the levels of MBL and CRP at the acute and recovery phases were determined. Fifty patients with the wild-type MBL genotype showed higher MBL levels in each phase (P < 0.001) and an increased risk to developing bacteraemia, odds ratio (OR) 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-7.52) (P = 0.02), but this did not correlate with the pneumonia severity class. CRP levels in the acute phase, 79.53 mg/l [standard deviation (s.d.) 106.93], were higher in the subjects with positive blood cultures (P = 0.003), and remained higher [20.12 mg/l (s.d. 31.90)] in the group of patients with an underlying disease (P = 0.01). No correlation was observed between the levels of MBL and CRP in each phase, or with the pneumonia severity score. We cannot conclude that MBL acts uniformly as an acute-phase reactant in pneumococcal pneumonia. MBL levels do not correlate well with the severity of the pneumonia. The risk of developing bacteraemia could be enhanced in individuals with the wild-type MBL genotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available