4.3 Article

Development and testing of a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire: ID Pain - Russell Portenoy for the ID pain steering committee

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1555-1565

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/030079906X115702

Keywords

ID pain; neuropathic pain; pain assessment; sensory description

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To develop a patient-completed screening tool to help differentiate nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Research design and methods: A multicenter study was performed for item reduction (initial 89-item questionnaire) and model building. Patients (N = 586) with non-headache chronic pain completed the questionnaire and were referred to pain specialists for diagnosis. Factor and regression analyses were used to derive a final, 6-item questionnaire - ID Pain. A second multicenter study evaluated reliability and validity. Patients (N = 308) treated by pain specialists completed ID Pain and validation measures. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and the concordance c index. Reliability was assessed using a statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: Final 6 items were: did the pain feel: (1) like pins and needles? (2) hot/burning? (3) numb? (4) like electrical shocks? (5) is the pain made worse with the touch of clothing or bed sheets? (6) is the pain limited to your joints? 'Yes' answers to questions 1 - 5 were scored as 1, while a 'yes' answer to question 6 was scored as -1. 'No' answers were scored as 0. Higher scores (-1 to 5) suggested a neuropathic component. The questionnaire accurately predicted diagnoses of neuropathic pain made by pain specialists. The concordance c indices in the studies were 0.73 and 0.69. The ICC was 0.742; the statistic ranged from 0.742 to 0.527. Conclusions: ID Pain appeared to accurately indicate the presence of a neuropathic component of pain. As a brief, self-administered screening tool, it could be useful in primary care settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available