4.8 Article

Peginterferon-alfa2a plus ribavirin for 48 versus 72 weeks in patients with detectable hepatitis C virus RNA at week 4 of treatment

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 2, Pages 451-460

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.05.016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background&Aims: Patients with chronic hepatitis C who do not respond rapidly to therapy have a low chance of developing a sustained virologic response (SVR) when treated for 48 weeks. This study investigated whether treatment for 72 weeks increases the rate of SVR in patients with detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels at week 4 of treatment. Methods: A total of 51.0 treatment-naive patients were treated with peginterferon-alfa2a (180 mu g/wk) plus ribavirin (800 mg/day). Patients with detectable HCV-RNA levels at week 4 (n = 326) were randomized to complete 48 (group A, n = 165) or 72 weeks (group B, In = 161) of treatment. Patients with undetectable HCV-RNA levels at week 4 (n = 184) were allocated into group C (n = 148) or group D (n = 36), according to HCV genotype and baseline viremia, and treated for 24 or 48 weeks, respectively. All patients were followed-up for 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Results: The end-of-treatment response rate (61%) was similar in groups A and 13, but the SVR rate was higher in group B (45% vs 32% in A; P =.01). In genotype 1-infected patients randomized to group A (n = 149) or B (n = 142), SVR rates were 28% and 44%, respectively (P =.003). The incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups. Treatment discontinuation was more frequent in group B (36%) than in group A (18%) (P =.0004). SVR rates in groups C and D were 79% and 64%, respectively. Conclusions: Extension of treatment with peginterferon-alfa2a plus ribavirin from 48 to 72 weeks significantly increases the rate of SVR in patients with detectable viremia at week 4 of treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available