4.7 Article

Memory effect-enhanced catalytic ozonation of aqueous phenol and oxalic acid over supported Cu catalysts derived from hydrotalcite

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 3-4, Pages 247-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2006.05.005

Keywords

catalytic ozonation; phenol; oxalic acid; Cu/Mg/Al catalyst; hydrotalcite; memory effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mg/Al supported metal (Fe, Co, Ni and Cu) oxide catalysts were prepared by co-precipitation of hydrotalcite-like clay materials as precursors, calcined, and used for the ozonation reaction of phenol and oxalic acid. The reaction was carried out using the catalyst and aqueous solution of phenol or oxalic acid in an 0(3)/0(2) mixed gas-flow at 20 degrees C. In the ozonation of phenol, the combination of ozone and supported metal oxide catalysts was effective for the removal of total organic carbon (TOC). Also in the ozonation of oxalic acid as the main TOC component, Cu/Mg/Al catalysts showed the highest activity, followed by Ni/Mg/Al catalyst, while both Fe/Mg/Al and Co/Mg/Al catalysts were not active. Leaching of Cu and Ni, probably due to the chelation of metals by oxalic acid, was significantly observed at the beginning of the reaction. However the metal leaching disappeared at the end of the reaction possibly due to the entire consumption of oxalic acid during the reaction. The best result of oxalic acid mineralization was observed over Cu/Mg/Al catalyst calcined at 600 degrees C, on which least leaching of the metal was detected. Moreover, a memory effect of hydrotalcite accelerated the mineralization of oxalic acid over the Cu/Mg/AI catalyst; oxalate anions were captured and decomposed in the reconstituted hydrotalcite interlayer space on the surface of the Cu/Mg/AI catalyst, resulting in a remarkable enhancement in the catalytic activity of the ozonation. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available