4.7 Review

Oxidative stress and redox regulation of phospholipase D in myocardial disease

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 349-361

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.03.025

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress may be viewed as an imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidant production and the state of glutathione redox buffer and antioxidant defense system. Recently, a new paradigm of redox signaling has emerged whereby ROS and oxidants can function as intracellular signaling molecules, where ROS- and oxidant-induced death signal is converted into a survival signal. It is now known that oxidative stress is involved in cardiac hypertrophy and in the pathogenesis of cardiomyopathies, ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure. Phospholipase D (PLD) is an important signaling enzyme in mammalian cells, including cardiomyocytes. PLD catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine to produce phosphatidic acid (PA). Two mammalian PLD isozymes, PLD1 and PLD2 have been identified, characterized and cloned. The importance of PA in heart function is evident from its ability to stimulate cardiac sarcolemmal membrane and sarcoplasmic reticular Ca2+-related transport systems and to increase the intracellular concentration of free Ca2+ in adult cardiomyocytes and augment cardiac contractile activity of the normal heart. In addition, PA is also considered an important signal transducer in cardiac hypertrophy. Accordingly, this review discusses a role for redox signaling mediated via PLD in ischemic preconditioning and examines how oxidative stress affects PLD in normal hearts and during different myocardial diseases. In addition, the review provides a comparative account on the regulation of PLD activities in vascular smooth muscle cells under conditions of oxidative stress. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available