4.8 Article

Increased cardiac adenylyl cyclase expression is associated with increased survival after myocardial infarction

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 388-396

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.632513

Keywords

gene therapy; receptors, adrenergic, beta; cAMP; coronary disease; signal transduction

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL66941, HL081741] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background - Cardiac-directed expression of adenylyl cyclase type VI (AC(VI)) in mice results in structurally normal hearts with normal basal heart rate and function but increased responses to catecholamine stimulation. We tested the hypothesis that increased left ventricular (LV) AC(VI) content would increase mortality after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and Results - Transgenic mice with cardiac-directed AC(VI) expression and their transgene-negative littermates (control) underwent coronary ligation, and survival, infarct size, and LV size and function were assessed 1 to 7 days after MI. Mice with increased AC(VI) expression had increased survival (control 41%, AC(VI) 74%; P = 0.004). Infarct size and myocardial apoptotic rates were similar in ACVI and control mice; however, ACVI mice had less LV dilation (P < 0.001) and increased ejection fractions (P < 0.03). Three days after MI, studies in isolated perfused hearts showed that basal LV + dP/dt was similar, but graded dobutamine infusion was associated with a more robust LV contractile response in AC(VI) mice (P < 0.05). Increased LV function was associated with increases in cAMP generation (P = 0.0002), phospholamban phosphorylation (P < 0.04), sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2a) affinity for calcium (P < 0.015), and reduced AV block (P = 0.04). Conclusions - In acute MI, increased cardiac AC(VI) content attenuates adverse LV remodeling, preserves LV contractile function, and reduces mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available