4.7 Article

Combined uptake of [18F]FDG and [18F]FMISO correlates with radiation therapy outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages 151-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.033

Keywords

FMISO; FDG; PET; hypoxia; head-and-neck cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: FDG PET is frequently used for radiotherapy (RT) planning to determine the tumour extent. Similarly, FMISO is used to assess the hypoxic sub-volume. The relationship between the volumes determined on the basis of FDG and FMISO was investigated. Additionally, the quantitative correlation of the tracers on a voxel basis was studied. Methods: Twelve head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients underwent FDG and FMISO PET examinations prior to RT treatment. The tumour volumes assessed by the two tracers and also the voxel-based joint uptake values were investigated. The characteristic shapes and patterns of the determined scatter plots were analyzed. A number of different variables such as the maximum uptake values of FDG and FMISO, the FDG and FMISO positive volumes, the slope m of the regression line and the scatter width a sigma of the scatter plots were tested for their ability to stratify the patient group with respect to treatment outcome. Results: A diversity of characteristic FDG-FMISO distributions was observed in the patient group. However, no general correlation of enhanced glucose metabolism and FMISO uptake was observed. The maximum uptake of FMISO (p = 0.045) showed borderline significance for stratifying the patient group. FDG positive tumour volume, hypoxic fraction, maximum FDG uptake and m were not significant. sigma turned out to be the most significant variable (p = 0.008) to predict treatment success probabilities. Conclusion: FMISO and FDG PET data provide independent information about the examined tumour. A quantification of the correlated tracer uptake seems to be meaningful. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available