4.5 Review

Alley coppice-a new system with ancient roots

Journal

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 527-542

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-014-0373-5

Keywords

High-value timber production; Short-rotation coppice; Alley cropping; Agroforestry; Coppice with standards; Biodiversity; Biomass; SRC

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF
  2. Germany)
  3. Ministere de l'Agriculture, de l'Ali-mentation de la Peche, de la Ruralite, et de l'Amenagement du Territoire (MAAPRAT
  4. France)
  5. Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies (MIPAAF
  6. Italy)
  7. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Ireland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current production from natural forests will not satisfy future world demand for timber and fuel wood, and new land management options are required. We explore an innovative production system that combines the production of short rotation coppice in wide alleys with the production of high-value trees on narrow strips of land; it is an alternative form of alley cropping which we propose to call 'alley coppice'. The aim is to describe this alley coppice system and to illustrate its potential for producing two diverse products, namely high-value timber and energy wood on the same land unit. Based on a comprehensive literature review, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of the alley coppice system and contrast the features with well-known existing or past systems of biomass and wood production. We describe and discuss the basic aspects of alley coppice, its design and dynamics, the processes of competition and facilitation, issues of ecology, and areas that are open for future research. Based on existing knowledge, a solid foundation for the implementation of alley coppice on suitable land is presented, and the high potential of this system could be shown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available