4.6 Article

Allergic lung inflammation induces pulmonary vascular hyperresponsiveness

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 370-377

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00080105

Keywords

allergic inflammation; 5-hydroxytryptamine; isolated mouse lung; ovalbumin; pulmonary hypertension; serotonin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulmonary arterial vasoconstriction is an important early component of pulmonary hypertension. Inflammatory mechanisms play a prominent role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension. The present authors investigated the potential role of acute allergic lung inflammation for alterations in pulmonary haemodynamics. BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally sensitised to ovalburnin and challenged by ovalbumin inhalation. Subsequently, lungs were ventilated and perfused ex vivo, and pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) was continuously monitored. Isolated perfused lungs of allergen-sensitised and -challenged mice showed five-fold enhanced Ppa responses to serotonin, which is reported to be a significant contributor to pulmonary hypertension in humans. This increase in Ppa was abolished by the serotonin receptor-2A antagonist ketanserin, but not the serotonin receptor-1B antagonist GR127935. Intracellular signalling to serotonin involved phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C and protein kinase C, as well as Rho-kinase, as assessed by employing the specific inhibitors D609, bisindolylmaleimide and Y27632, respectively. In addition to serotonin, impressively enhanced Ppa increases in allergic lungs were also evoked by the thromboxane receptor agonist U46619, angiotensin II and endothelin-1. In conclusion, allergic lung inflammation was accompanied by impressive pulmonary vascular hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest a possible role for allergic inflammation in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available