4.5 Article

Back to the roots: how do seedlings of native tree species react to the competition by exotic species?

Journal

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages 337-347

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-013-0347-z

Keywords

Biomass allocation; Balanced growth hypothesis; Pot experiment; Prunus serotina; Robinia pseudoacacia

Categories

Funding

  1. Marianne and Dr. Fritz-Walter Fischer Foundation within the Stifterverband fur die Deutsche Wissenschaft
  2. DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service) VIGONI program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying the traits of exotic species may explain their invasiveness and help control the negative impacts of these species on native ecosystems. In this study, we investigated root competition as an important driver for the competitiveness of two exotic tree species in the seedling stage. In a pot experiment, carried out in Central Europe, we studied the effect of root competition of two exotic tree species (Prunus serotina Ehrh. and Robinia pseudoacacia L.) on biomass allocation of two native ones (Quercus robur L. and Carpinus betulus L.). Seedlings of these species were exposed to intra- and interspecific mixtures with and without the effect of root competition. For this, belowground plastic partitions were installed in the pots. Competition intensity in the pots increased over time, irrespective of mixture type. However, this increase was much higher for the native species if mixed with the exotic species compared to monocultures or inter-native mixtures. In addition to ontogeny, competition affected biomass allocation patterns. Under root competition by the exotic species, the native species preferentially allocated their biomass to the roots. A higher allocation to the roots was mainly achieved at the expense of leaf and branch biomass. Root competition of P. serotina and R. pseudoacacia may be a reason for the lack of Q. robur and C. betulus in the seedling stage in natural environments where all four species occur.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available