4.5 Article

Hydraulic properties and embolism in small-diameter roots of five temperate broad-leaved tree species with contrasting drought tolerance

Journal

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 693-703

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0189-0

Keywords

Acer pseudoplatanus; Carpinus betulus; Coarse roots; Drought tolerance; Fagus sylvatica; Fraxinus excelsior; Root hydraulic conductivity; Root embolism; Tilia cordata; Vessel diameter

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [Graduiertenkolleg 1086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been estimated that about half of a plant's total hydraulic resistance is located belowground, but it is not well known how temperate tree species differ in root hydraulic properties and how these traits vary with the species' drought tolerance. We examined root anatomical and hydraulic traits in five broad-leaved tree species with different drought tolerance, analyzed the relation between root anatomy and hydraulic conductivity and root embolism, and investigated the relation of these traits to the species' drought tolerance. In small-diameter roots (2-6 mm), we measured vessel diameters and vessel density, specific hydraulic conductivity, and the percental loss of conductivity (native embolism) during summer in a mixed forest. Specific conductivity was positively related to vessel diameter but not to vessel density. Drought-tolerant Fraxinus showed the smallest mean vessel diameters and drought-sensitive Fagus the largest. Specific conductivity was highly variable among different similar-sized roots of the same species with a few roots apparently functioning as high-conductivity roots. The results show that coexisting tree species can differ largely in root hydraulic traits with more drought-sensitive trees apparently having larger mean vessel diameters in their roots than tolerant species. However, this difference was not related to the observed root conductivity losses due to embolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available