4.5 Article

Response to canopy opening does not act as a filter to Fagus sylvatica and Acer sp advance regeneration in a mixed temperate forest

Journal

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009086

Keywords

canopy gap; competition; light acclimation; shade tolerance; Acer pseudoplatanus; Acer campestre; Acer platanoides

Categories

Funding

  1. Region Lorraine [342.2004]
  2. Office National des Forets
  3. INRA [BTH01667]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mixed-species forest stands, large losses in tree species diversity often occur during the regeneration phase. In a former coppice-with-standards, we investigated whether the limiting stage in the recruitment process of advance regeneration is the immediate seedling response to canopy release. Experimental canopy gaps were opened and the survival and growth of advance seedlings ( Fagus sylvatica, Acer pseudoplatanus, Acer campestre, Acer platanoides) growing in the gaps or under closed canopy were monitored for three years. All species responded positively and rapidly to canopy release. Survival was not affected by gap opening. Diameter increment after gap opening was similar across species, and height increment was greater for Acer platanoides and for Acer pseudoplatanus. Post-release diameter and height growth were mainly determined by pre-release seedling size. Competition from neighbouring seedlings did not affect growth in the three years following canopy opening. In the recruitment process of F. sylvatica and Acer sp. advance regeneration, the recovery from canopy release did not appear as a limiting step that would filter against some species. Pre-release size was the main factor accounting for post-release growth and is probably a major determinant of long-term seedling dominance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available