4.6 Article

Numerical simulations of thermomagnetic instability in high-Tc superconductors:: Dependence on sweep rate and ambient temperature

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.054507

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the results of numerical simulations of flux jumps on the basis of dynamic process of thermomagnetic interaction to the nonisothermal and nonadiabatic high-T-c superconductors in the regime of thermally activated flux creep when an applied magnetic field is parallel to a slab of the high-T-c superconductors. The simulations for the samples of BiSrCaCuO show that the flux jumps may occur only in the region of low ambient temperature, which is dependent upon the heat contact, and the sweep rate is greater than a lower critical value of about 20 G/s and lesser than a large one up to the order of 1-10 T/s. It is found that the predictions of the first flux-jump field B-fj1 are quantitatively in good agreement with the existing experimental data, and the temperature jumps are observed in the superconductors, corresponding to each flux jump in the magnetization loop. When the field sweep rate exceeds the large critical value for the case of the superconductor at 4.2 K, the phenomenon of experimental observations without flux jump is successfully predicted by the theoretical simulation, where the thermomagnetic interaction is smoothly circulated at a new dynamic equilibrium state in the temperature region of about 10.6-16.4 K higher than the ambient one, which is mainly dependent on the tradeoff of speeds of the dissipation energy in the slab and the heat removed into the coolant. After that, the sensitivity of the thermomagnetic instability to the parameters, such as critical current density, heat conductivity, heat transfer coefficient, critical geometrical scale, etc. is also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available