4.5 Article

Has global change induced divergent trends in radial growth of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus halepensis at their bioclimatic limit? The example of the Sainte-Baume forest (south-east France)

Journal

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
Volume 65, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2008048

Keywords

global change; bioclimatic limit; radial growth; Pinus halepensis; Pinus sylvestris

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Interest Group (GIP) on Forest Ecosystems (Ecofor)
  2. Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur Region and Cemagref

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is agreed that climate (precipitation and temperature) influences the distribution of plant species. Near the margins of a species' natural range, climate becomes limiting to physiological processes. There, climate change may be expected to have a significant impact on tree growth and the species' ranges may be altered. In order to assess what influence climate change could exert on the distribution of pine species at their margin, radial growth trends in ring-width chronologies over the last century were analysed. In the French Mediterranean area where climate change is characterized by increased temperature, forest plots were selected along an altitudinal transect on the north-facing slope of the Sainte-Baume mountain (Bouches-du-Rhone, France) where the ranges of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus halepensis overlap. Two growth patterns were identified. For P. halepensis, radial growth has increased at all altitudes indicating that climate change has improved growth conditions of this species near the margin of its ecological range. For P. sylvestris, radial growth has increased only at low altitudes and even decreased at high altitudes. It must be deduced that the growth changes observed cannot be generalised either at the species level or at the geographical level and must be interpreted with great caution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available