4.7 Article

Comparative proteomics in neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative diseases suggest nodal point proteins in regulatory networking

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 8, Pages 1948-1958

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr0601077

Keywords

neurodegeneration; brain; proteome; mouse model; nodal points; protein network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurodegenerative disorders (ND) encompass clinically and genetically heterogeneous diseases with considerable overlap of their clinical, neuropathological and molecular phenotype. Various causes of neurodegeneration in disease may affect eventually the same proteins within protein networks. To identify common changes in ND, we compared brain protein changes detected by 2-D electrophoresis in four mouse models for ND: (i) Parkinson's disease, (ii) Huntington's disease, (iii) prion disease Scrapie, and (iv) a model for impaired synaptic transmission. To determine specificity of these changes for ND, we extended the scope of our investigation to three neurological conditions that do not result in neurodegeneration (non-ND). We detected 12 to 216 consistent qualitative or quantitative protein changes in individual ND and non-ND models when compared to controls. Up to 36% of these proteins were found to be altered in multiple disease states (at least three) and were therefore termed nodal point proteins. Alterations in alpha B-Crystallin and splicing factor 3b (subunit 4) occurred in at least three ND but not in non-ND. In contrast, alterations in peroxiredoxin 1 and 3, astrocytic phosphoprotein PEA15, complexin 2 and aminoacylase 1 were common to both ND and non-ND. Finally, we investigated the expression pattern of the nodal point proteins in three inbred mouse strains and found different protein abundance (expression polymorphisms) in all cases. Nodal point proteins showing expression polymorphisms may be candidate proteins for disease associated modifiers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available