4.7 Article

Evaluation of polychlorotrifluoroethylene as sorbent material for on-line solid phase extraction systems: Determination of copper and lead by flame atomic absorption spectrometry in water samples

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 575, Issue 1, Pages 126-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.05.072

Keywords

copper; polychlorotrifluoroethylene; on-line preconcentration; atomic absorption spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polychlorotrifluoroethylene (PCTFE) in the form of beads was applied, as packing material for flow injection on-line column preconcentration and separation systems coupled with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). Its performance characteristics were evaluated for trace copper determination in environmental samples. The on-line formed complex of metal with diethyldithiophosphate (DDPA) was sorbed on the PCTFE surface. Isobutyl methyl ketone (IBMK) at a flow rate of 2.8 mL min(-1) was used to elute the analyte complex directly into the nebulizer-bumer system of spectrophotometer. The proposed sorbent material reveal, excellent chemical and mechanical resistance, fast adsorption kinetics permitting the use of high sample flow rates up to 15 mL min(-1) without loss of retention efficiency. For copper determination, with 90 s preconcentration time the sample frequency was 30 h(-1), the enhancement factor was 250, which could be further improved by increasing the loading (preconcentration) time. The detection limit (3s) was c(L) = 0.07 mu g L-1, and the precision (R.S.D.) was 1.8%, at the 2.0 mu g L-1 Cu(II) level. For lead determination, the detection limit was CL = 2.7 mu g L-1, and the precision (R.S.D.) 2.2%, at the 40.0 mu g L-1 Pb(II) level. The accuracy of the developed method was evaluated by analyzing certified reference materials and by recovery measurements on spiked natural water samples. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available