4.4 Article

Treatment Adjustment and Medication Adherence for Complex Patients With Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 6-14

Publisher

ANNALS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1370/afm.1343

Keywords

Treatment adjustment; medication adherence; multicondition; diabetes; coronary heart disease; depression; collaborative care; treat-to-target; chronic care model; TEAMcare

Funding

  1. John A. Hartford Foundation
  2. Johnson Johnson
  3. Rewarding Health
  4. Group Health Cooperative
  5. Wyeth
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Forest Laboratories
  8. Pfizer
  9. National Institute of Mental Health [MH041739, MH069741]
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K08MH069741, R01MH041739] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE Medication nonadherence, inconsistent patient self-monitoring, and inadequate treatment adjustment exacerbate poor disease control. In a collaborative, team-based, care management program for complex patients (TEAMcare), we assessed patient and physician behaviors (medication adherence, self-monitoring, and treatment adjustment) in achieving better outcomes for diabetes, coronary heart disease, and depression. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted (2007-2009) in 14 primary care clinics among 214 patients with poorly controlled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] >= 8.5%) or coronary heart disease (blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >130 mg/dL) with coexisting depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score >= 10). In the TEAMcare program, a nurse care manager collaborated closely with primary care physicians, patients, and consultants to deliver a treat-to-target approach across multiple conditions. Measures included medication initiation, adjustment, adherence, and disease self-monitoring. RESULTS Pharmacotherapy initiation and adjustment rates were sixfold higher for antidepressants (relative rate [RR] = 6.20; P < .001), threefold higher for insulin (RR = 2.97; P < .001), and nearly twofold higher for antihypertensive medications (RR = 1.86, P < .001) among TEAMcare relative to usual care patients. Medication adherence did not differ between the 2 groups in any of the 5 therapeutic classes examined at 12 months. TEAMcare patients monitored blood pressure (RR = 3.20; P < .001) and glucose more frequently (RR = 1.28; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS Frequent and timely treatment adjustment by primary care physicians, along with increased patient self-monitoring, improved control of diabetes, depression, and heart disease, with no change in medication adherence rates. High baseline adherence rates may have exerted a ceiling effect on potential improvements in medication adherence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available