4.6 Article

Intravenous mesenchymal stem cell therapy early after reperfused acute myocardial infarction improves left ventricular function and alters electrophysiologic properties

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 231-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.07.036

Keywords

apical infarction; occlusion; reperfusion

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL090653] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct intramyocardial injection of mesenchymal stem cells (SCs) improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and may increase ventricular arrhythmia in hearts with myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesized that intravenous MSCs given early after acute MI would engraft in injured myocardium, improve LV function, and result in pro-arrhythmic electrical remodeling. We created an apical infarction in swine by balloon occlusion/reperfusion, administered dil-labeled allogeneic bone marrow derived MSCs intravenously 30 min post-reperfusion and measured LVEF and wall thickness at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Epicardial effective refractory periods (ERPs) were determined before sacrifice. At 3 months, treated pigs [n=7] had significantly higher LVEF than controls [n=8] (49 +/- 2% vs. 44 +/- 3%, P=0.015)and significantly less wall thickening of non-infarcted myocardium. ERPs were significantly shorter than controls at all pacing cycle lengths (P <= 0.002), suggesting a pro-arrhythmic potential. DiI was found in the lungs, in infarct, and peri-infarct myocardium. Conclusion: IV infusion of MSCs soon after acute MI in swine improves LVEF and limits wall thickening in the remote non-infarcted myocardium, consistent with a beneficial effect on post-M ventricular remodeling. Since there is no need for immune suppression or clinical expertise, IV infusion of MSCs may expand the potential clinical application of stem cell therapy. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available