4.4 Review

Guidelines for the Primary Care of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People: A Systematic Review

Journal

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 533-541

Publisher

ANNALS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1370/afm.1173

Keywords

Homosexuality; male homosexuality; female bisexuality; female male minority groups; delivery of health care standards guidelines; evidence based medicine primary care

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Australia)
  2. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE We assessed whether existing guidelines for the primary care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people meet appropriate standards of develop mental rigor, and whether they provide consistent recommendations useful for primary care clinicians METHODS We performed a systematic review of such guidelines using the Cochrane Collaboration method The countries searched were Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States For sources, we used electronic databases, guidelines databases, primary care professional organizations, government departments of public health, LGB health care textbooks, and national LGB organizations We assessed the quality of existing guidelines using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument and compared the recommendations from all fully appraised guidelines RESULTS Our search did not identify any previous systematic reviews on primary care of LGB people Of 2 421 documents identified we initially reviewed 30 and fully appraised 11 none of which completely satisfied the AGREE criteria for quality and only 2 of which were specifically designed for primary care Developmental rigor was poor Particular gaps were a lack of explicit inclusion criteria, independent reviewers, and updating procedures Nonetheless, we did identify several consistent recommendations pertinent to primary care settings guidance on inclusive clinical environments standards for clinician-patient communication sensitive documentation of sexual orientation knowledge for cultural awareness staff training, and addressing population health issues CONCLUSIONS Currently available guidelines for LGB care are philosophically and practically consistent, and provide a degree of evidence based clinical and systems support to primary care clinicians There is a need however for evidence based LGB guidelines that are more rigorously developed disseminated, and evaluated specifically for the primary care setting

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available