4.7 Article

The central engines of 19 liners as viewed by Chandra

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 647, Issue 1, Pages 140-160

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505296

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : nuclei; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using archival Chandra observations of 19 LINERs, we explore the X-ray properties of their inner kiloparsec to determine the origin of their nuclear X-ray emission, to investigate the presence of an AGN, and to identify the power source of the optical emission lines. The relative numbers of LINER types in our sample are similar to those in optical spectroscopic surveys. We find that diffuse, thermal emission is very common and is concentrated within the central few hundred parsecs. The average spectra of the hot gas in spiral and elliptical galaxies are very similar to those of normal galaxies. They can be fitted with a thermal plasma (kT similar to 0: 5 keV) plus a power-law (photon index of 1.3 - 1.5) model. There are on average three detected point sources in their inner kiloparsec with 1037 ergs s(-1) < L0.5-10 keV < 10(40) ergs s(-1). The average cumulative luminosity functions for sources in spiral and elliptical galaxies are identical to those of normal galaxies. In the innermost circle of 2''5 radius in each galaxy we find an AGN in 12 of the 19 galaxies. The AGNs contribute a median of 60% of the 0.5-10 keV luminosity of the central 2''5 region, and they have luminosities of 10(37) - 10(39) ergs s(-1) (Eddington ratios of 10(-8) to 10(-5)). The ionizing luminosity of the AGNs is not enough to power the observed optical emission lines in this particular sample. Thus, we suggest that the lines are powered either by the mechanical interaction of an AGN jet (or wind) with the circumnuclear gas or by stellar processes, such as photoionization by post-AGB stars from an old or intermediate-age population (in most cases) or by young stars (in a few cases).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available