4.8 Article

Reduction of uranyl in the interlayer region of low iron micas under anoxic and aerobic conditions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 16, Pages 5003-5009

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es0522478

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of the interlayer region of three different Fe-II-poor micas (2.8, similar to 0.02, and 0.01 Fe-II atom %) in the reduction of U-VI was investigated at pH similar to 4.3, low ionic strength, and 23 degrees C under both anoxic and aerated conditions in batch reactors for 1 to 10 days. U diffusion profiles were mapped with X-ray microscopy, and the oxidation state of U was tracked with XANES as a function of distance from the crystal edge. Peak U concentrations only reached about 0.006-0.0002 atom percent, where the full-width-at-half-maximums of the diffusion fronts were roughly 25-50 mu m. Results for anoxic conditions indicated appreciable reduction of uranyl in all three micas with no measurable dependency on distance from the edge. Under aerobic (open to the atmosphere) conditions, U was still partially reduced, although to a lesser degree than for anoxic conditions, and U-VI/U-tot increased with time. Interestingly, reoxidation reached a plateau after about 3-10 days, leaving an appreciable proportion of U reduced. It is likely that measurable reduction occurred, despite low Fe-II, because U concentrations were even lower, where Fe-II/U ratios ranged from about 10(4)-10(2). A coupled diffusion-reduction model was developed that successfully simulated the proximal portion of the diffusion front. The results show that reduction of U-VI in the interlayer of low Fe-II micas is, in principle, viable and that under aerobic conditions reduction is initially faster than reoxidation. This extends the range of possible environments where heterogeneous reduction of U-VI by micas might occur.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available