4.7 Article

Nutritional status and prognosis in cirrhotic patients

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 563-572

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03003.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aim The potential prognostic value for survival of nutritional status in cirrhotics after adjusting Child-Pugh classification and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease has not been evaluated. Methods We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify factors associated with mortality in a cohort of 222 cirrhotics [M/F:145/77 median age 52 (18-68) years] with prospectively collected nutritional parameters as well as modified subjective global nutritional assessment, Royal Free Hospital-Subjective Global Assessment index. Follow-up was censored at the time of transplantation. Other variables were ones in Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, age, aetiology of cirrhosis and renal function, Results Pretransplant mortality (Kaplan-Meier) was 21% by 2 years (135 patients were transplanted). Among the nutritional parameters, only Royal Free Hospital-Subjective Global Assessment remained significantly associated with mortality in multivariable models (P = 0.0006). The final model included the following variables: urea (P = 0.0001), Royal Free Hospital-Subjective Global Assessment (P = 0.003), age (P = 0.0001), Child-Pugh grade (P = 0.009) and prothrombin time (P = 0.003). The results were similar when the Child-Pugh grade was replaced by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score in the model, and whether a competing risks model was used. Conclusions Nutritional indices add significantly to both Child-Pugh grade and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores when assessing the patient prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available