4.7 Article

Short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in biota from the European Arctic - differences in homologue group patterns

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 367, Issue 1, Pages 252-260

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.12.014

Keywords

polychlorinated n-alkanes; chlorinated paraffins; Congener pattern; homologue distribution; Arctic; Biota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congener and homologue group patterns of chlorinated paraffins (CPS) in biota can be influenced by different processes, but these are not well studied yet. Short- (SCCPs) and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (MCCPs) were quantified in liver from Arctic char and seabirds (little auk and kittiwake) collected at Bear Island (European Arctic) as well as in cod from Iceland and Norway. CP concentrations were between 5 and 88 ng/g wet weight (ww) for SCCPs and between 5 and 55 ng/g ww for MCCPs with one exception of 370 ng/g measured in a liver sample from little auk. The SCCP homologue group patterns were compared with those of technical mixtures and of SCCPs present in cod liver from the Baltic Sea. The latter showed a more common SCCP homologue distribution (sum of C-11 and C-12 > 60%) in contrast to cod liver from the Northwest of Europe, which had a high abundance of C-10 and C-12 congeners. Seabirds from Bear Island contained an equally distributed SCCP homologue group pattern. In Arctic char, the SCCP distribution was closer to technical products, but with a high proportion (average of 18.9%) of C-10 congeners. A comparison of C-10/C-12 ratios confirmed the higher abundance of C-10 congeners in samples from higher latitudes. For the first time, MCCPs could be detected in Arctic samples. The average proportion of C-14 congeners was 65.8%. The C-14/C-15 abundance ratio was similar to technical mixtures. High-chlorinated CPS (Cl-> 7) were also detectable. The average chlorine content of the SCCPs was 61.9% (59.0-63.3%), and that of the MCCPs 55.8% (54.5-57.4%). (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available