4.7 Article

Three- vs four-drug antiretroviral regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection - A randomized controlled trial

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 296, Issue 7, Pages 769-781

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.7.769

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00096, RR02635, RR00052, RR00047, RR00046, RR00044, RR00865] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 25903, AI 25897, AI, 27660, AI 25879, AI 25868, AI 25859, AI 01781, AI 27673, AI 27675, AI 27767, AI 27670, AI 28697, AI 32775, AI 32782, AI 34832, AI 38855, AI 38858, AI 39156, AI 27668, AI 42848, AI 27664, AI 42851, AI 46339, AI 46370, AI 27661, AI 27659, AI 46376, AI 51966, AI 50410, AI 46386, AI 46381, AI 25915, AI 25924, AI 27658] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Three-drug antiretroviral regimens are standard of care for initial treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection, but a 4-drug regimen could improve antiretroviral activity and be more effective than a 3-drug regimen. Objective To compare the safety/efficacy of 3-drug vs 4-drug regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. Design The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5095 study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with enrollment and follow-up conducted from March 22, 2001, to March 1, 2005, and enrolling treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of 400 copies/mL or greater from US clinical trials units of the ACTG. Interventions Zidovudine/lamivudine plus efavirenz (3-drug regimen) vs zidovudine/ lamivudine/abacavir plus efavirenz (4-drug regimen). Main Outcome Measures Time to virologic failure ( defined as time to first of 2 successive HIV-1 RNA levels >= 200 copies/mL at or after week 16), CD4 cell count changes, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. HIV-1 RNA data were intent-to-treat, regardless of treatment changes. Results Seven hundred sixty-five patients with a baseline mean HIV-1 RNA level of 4.86 log(10) ( 72 444) copies/mL and CD4 cell count of 240 cells/mm(3) were randomized. After a median 3-year follow-up, 99 (26%) of 382 and 94 (25%) of 383 patients receiving the 3-drug and 4-drug regimens, respectively, reached protocol-defined virologic failure; time to virologic failure was not significantly different ( hazard ratio, 0.95; 97.5% confidence interval, 0.69-1.33; P=. 73). In planned subgroup analyses, increased risk for virologic failure was seen in non-Hispanic black patients ( adjusted hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.34; P=. 003). At 3 years, the HIV-1 RNA level was less than 200 copies/mL in 152 (90%) of 169 and 143 (92%) of 156 patients receiving the 3-drug and 4-drug regimens, respectively ( P=. 59), and less than 50 copies/mL in 144 (85%) of 169 and 137 (88%) of 156 patients ( P=. 39). CD4 cell count increases and grade 3 or 4 adverse events were not significantly different. Conclusions In treatment-naive patients, there were no significant differences between the 3-drug and 4-drug antiretroviral regimens; overall, at least approximately 80% of patients had HIV-1 RNA levels less than 50 copies/mL through 3 years. These results support current guidelines recommending 2 nucleosides plus efavirenz for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection; adding abacavir as a fourth drug provided no additional benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available