4.6 Review

de FACTo nucleosome dynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 281, Issue 33, Pages 23297-23301

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R600007200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM37120, GM71166] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The factors required for the delivery of RNA polymerase II to class II promoters using naked DNA were all identified by 1998, yet their exact mechanisms of action were not fully understood in all cases, and in some instances, their precise function still remains unknown. Nonetheless, a complete understanding of the complexity of the RNA polymerase II transcription cycle necessitated the development of assays that include chromatinized DNA templates. At this time, the field was actively searching for factors that allow transcription initiation on chromatinized templates. We began studies using chromatin templates in an attempt to identify factor(s) that permit RNA polymerase II to traverse nucleosomes, i.e. that allow elongation on chromatinized DNA templates. The challenge herein was to develop an assay that directly measured the ability of transcriptionally engaged RNA polymerase II to traverse nucleosomes. This approach resulted in the isolation of FACT, a heterodimer in humans comprised of Spt16 and SSRP1. Defined functional biochemical assays corroborated genetic studies in yeast that allowed the elucidation of FACT function in vivo. Collectively, these approaches demonstrate that FACT is a factor that allows RNA polymerase II to traverse nucleosomes in vitro and in vivo by removing one H2A/H2B dimer. More recent studies using a fully defined chromatin reconstitution/transcription assay revealed that FACT activity is greatly stimulated by post-translational modification of the histone polypeptides, specifically by monoubiquitination of lysine 120 of human histone H2B.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available