4.5 Article

The combined use of human neural and liver cell lines and mouse hepatocytes improves the predictability of the neurotoxicity of selected drugs

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 165, Issue 2, Pages 195-202

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.04.002

Keywords

neurotoxicity in vitro; metabolic activation; amitriptyline; selegiline; paracetamol; carbamazepine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cytotoxicity of amitriptyine (0-100 mu M). selegiline (0-4.5 mu M). carbamazepine (0-420 mu M) and paracetamol (0-10 mM) was studied in metabolically competent mouse hepatocytes. metabolically incompetent human hepatoblastoma (HepG2) cells and in neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) and astrocytoma (U-373 MG) cells. by using luminescence-based ATP measurement as an endpoint of cell toxicity. The aim was to evaluate the potential of the,;elected cell Culture.,; 10 recognize metabolism-induced toxicity of the test compounds. and to predict further hepatic and neural toxicity. In SH-SY5Y cells amitriptyline was severely toxic. while selegiline and paracetamol failed to show any toxic effect. and carbainazepine was only slightly toxic at the highest concentration. In U-373 MG cells the onset of amitriptyline toxicity started earlier than in SH-SY5Y cells. However, the highest amitriptyline concentration resulted in similar to 100% decrease in the viability of the SH-SY5Y cells. whereas the decrease in the viability of the U-373 MG cells was only similar to 30%. Selegiline. carbamazepine and paracetamol were toxic in mouse hepatocytes (but not ill HepG2 Cells). which suggests that these drugs may show metabolism-dependent (neuro)toxicity. In conclusion. compared to the use of neurons alone. better estimations of neurotoxicity call be made by the combined U C Of metabolically competent hepatocytes and glial cells (e.g. U-373 MG) together with neuronal cells (e.g. SH-SY5Y). (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available