4.8 Article

Dependence of single-molecule junction conductance on molecular conformation

Journal

NATURE
Volume 442, Issue 7105, Pages 904-907

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature05037

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since it was first suggested(1) that a single molecule might function as an active electronic component, a number of techniques have been developed to measure the charge transport properties of single molecules(2-12). Although scanning tunnelling microscopy observations under high vacuum conditions can allow stable measurements of electron transport, most measurements of a single molecule bonded in a metal - molecule - metal junction exhibit relatively large variations in conductance. As a result, even simple predictions about how molecules behave in such junctions have still not been rigorously tested. For instance, it is well known(13,14) that the tunnelling current passing through a molecule depends on its conformation; but although some experiments have verified this effect(15-18), a comprehensive mapping of how junction conductance changes with molecular conformation is not yet available. In the simple case of a biphenyl - a molecule with two phenyl rings linked by a single C - C bond - conductance is expected to change with the relative twist angle between the two rings, with the planar conformation having the highest conductance. Here we use amine link groups to form single-molecule junctions with more reproducible current - voltage characteristics(19). This allows us to extract average conductance values from thousands of individual measurements on a series of seven biphenyl molecules with different ring substitutions that alter the twist angle of the molecules. We find that the conductance for the series decreases with increasing twist angle, consistent with a cosine-squared relation predicted for transport through pi-conjugated biphenyl systems(13).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available