4.7 Article

Advance of tree-flowering dates in response to urban climate change

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 138, Issue 1-4, Pages 120-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.04.002

Keywords

tree phenology; flowering date; climate warming; temperature; urban heat island; Beijing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increase in temperature due to greenhouse effects is manifest in the changes in diurnal, annual and inter-annual patterns, which may alter phenological events in plants. Flowering dates of four tree species, Prunus davidina, Prunus armeniaca, Robinia pseudoacacia and Syringa oblata, were significantly advanced in response to temperature increase over the years 1950-2004 in Beijing, China, due to the impact of urban climate warming. Because both climate warming and the urban heat island effect in winter and early-spring were more rapid than in late-spring and early summer, the dates in early flowering species advanced more quickly than in late flowering species. The early flowering species, P. davidina, advanced by 2.9 days/decade, while the other species advanced by 1.5-2.0 days/decade during 1950-2004. Therefore, the intervals between flowering dates of different species were expanded. P davidina, flowering in early-spring, was much more sensitive to minimum and average temperatures (2.88-2.96 days/degrees C), but less sensitive to maximum temperature (2.46 days/degrees C). R. pseudoacacia, flowering late in the warmer season, was more sensitive to average and maximum temperatures (2.45-2.89 days/degrees C), but less sensitive to minimum temperature (1.91 days/degrees C). Statistical analysis showed that, in Beijing, plant flowering is most sensitive to average temperature over 30 days before average blossom date. On the basis of the temperature response curve, the goodness of fitting demonstrates that spring flowering dates can be predicted from the period when temperature is over 0 degrees C. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available