4.7 Article

Optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 3563-3570

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present here the optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) isolated from the fine fraction of biomass-burning aerosol collected in the Amazon basin during the LBA-SMOCC ( Large scale Biosphere atmosphere experiment in Amazonia - SMOke aerosols, Clouds, rainfall and Climate) experiment in September 2002. From the isolated HULIS, aerosol particles were generated and their scattering and absorption coefficients measured. The size distribution and mass of the particles were also recorded. The value of the index of refraction was derived from closure calculations based on particle size, scattering and absorption measurements. On average, the complex index of refraction at 532 nm of HULIS collected during day and nighttime was 1.65 - 0.0019i and 1.69 - 0.0016i, respectively. In addition, the imaginary part of the complex index of refraction was calculated using the measured absorption coefficient of the bulk HULIS. The mass absorption coefficient of the HULIS at 532 nm was found to be quite low (0.031 and 0.029 m(2) g(-1) for the day and night samples, respectively). However, due to the high absorption Angstrom exponent ( 6 - 7) of HULIS, the specific absorption increases substantially towards shorter wavelengths ( similar to 2-3 m(2) g(-1) at 300 nm), causing a relatively high ( up to 50%) contribution to the light absorption of our Amazonian aerosol at 300 nm. For the relative contribution of HULIS to light absorption in the entire solar spectrum, lower values (6.4 - 8.6%) are obtained, but those are still not negligible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available