4.5 Article

Intimate Partner Violence as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Depression Among Canadian Women in the Maternity Experience Survey

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 575-583

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.05.011

Keywords

Intimate Partner Violence; Postpartum Depression; Pregnancy; Survey

Funding

  1. NIH, National Institute on Aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: Intimate partner violence is a worldwide public health concern that predominantly affects women of reproductive age. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of exposure to intimate partner violence before, during, or after pregnancy on postpartum depression in a nationally representative sample of Canadian women. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed with the use of data from the Maternity Experience Survey conducted by Statistics Canada in 2006. A population-based sample of 8542 women 15 years and older who delivered singleton live births was selected from all Canadian provinces and territories; of those, 6421 completed a computer-assisted telephone interview. Recent experiences with and threats of physical or sexual violence by in intimate partner were examined in relation to postpartum depression assessed through the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. RESULTS: The prevalence of postpartum depression was 7.5% (95% confidence interval, 6.8-8.2). Controlling for confounders, odds of postpartum depression were significantly greater among women who reported partner violence in the past two years as opposed to those who did not (adjusted odds ratio 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.45). CONCLUSIONS: Intimate partner violence is positively associated with postpartum depression among Canadian women. Implications for healthcare practice are discussed. Aim Epidemiol 2010;20:575-583. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available