4.6 Article

Effect of small-scale shear on grazing and growth of the dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida

Journal

HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 407-418

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2005.11.009

Keywords

dinoflagellate; cryptophyte; small-scale turbulence; dinoflagellate grazing; effect of shear on predator-prey dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low turbulence environments have been hypothesized to be necessary for toxic outbreaks of the heterotrophic/mixotrophic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida. A toxic Pfiesteria outbreak occurred in the shallow waters (the flats) of the lower Pocomoke River, MD, USA, in 1997. During August 1999 and May and August 2000, data were collected with a Shallow Water ADV Turbulence Tripod (SWATT) to estimate turbulent shear at a location monitored for Pfiesteria on the flats. Approximately 78% of the observed shears were <= 1 s(-1) and 98% were <= 2 s(-1). Densities of Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates were low in the Pocomoke River during 1999 and 2000 and no toxic outbreaks occurred. In the laboratory, Couette cylinders were used to determine the effect of small-scale shear on feeding and growth of cultured P. piscicida growing on cryptophyte prey. Shear of 1 s(-1) had little or no effect on feeding or growth but 3 s(-1) reduced feeding and survival/growth of Pfiesteria zoospores. Small, rapidly dividing Pfiesteria cells were most susceptible to negative effects of shear. Pfiesteria appears to be more sensitive to small-scale shear than are most autotrophic dinollagellates. However, in the lower Pocomoke River, turbulent shear is rarely high enough to inhibit the growth of non-toxic Pfiesteria zoospores. Toxic functional types (TOX-A and TOX-B) may be more sensitive to small-scale shear; it will be important to determine the responses of these types of Pfiesteria in order to predict the affects of wind and tidal mixing on toxic outbreaks. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available