4.5 Article

Weight gain over 5 years in 21 966 meat-eating, fish-eating, vegetarian, and vegan men and women in EPIC-Oxford

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 1389-1396

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803305

Keywords

diet; weight gain; vegetarian; vegan; longitudinal study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians and vegans are leaner than omnivores. Longitudinal data on weight gain in these groups are sparse. Objective: We investigated changes in weight and body mass index (BMI) over a 5-year period in meat-eating, fish-eating, vegetarian, and vegan men and women in the UK. Design: Self-reported anthropometric, dietary and lifestyle data were collected at baseline in 1994 -1999 and at follow-up in 2000 -2003; the median duration of follow-up was 5.3 years. Subjects: A total of 21 966 men and women participating in Oxford arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition aged 20-69 years at baseline. Results: The mean annual weight gain was 389 (SD 884) g in men and 398 (SD 892) g in women. The differences between meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in age-adjusted mean BMI at follow-up were similar to those seen at baseline. Multivariable-adjusted mean weight gain was somewhat smaller in vegans (284 g in men and 303 g in women, P < 0.05 for both sexes) and fish-eaters (338 g, women only, P < 0.001) compared with meat-eaters. Men and women who changed their diet in one or several steps in the direction meat-eater -> fish-eater -> vegetarian-vegan showed the smallest mean annual weight gain of 242 (95% CI 133 -351) and 301 (95% CI 238 -365) g, respectively. Conclusion: During 5 years follow-up, the mean annual weight gain in a health-conscious cohort in the UK was approximately 400 g. Small differences in weight gain were observed between meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans. Lowest weight gain was seen among those who, during follow-up, had changed to a diet containing fewer animal food.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available