4.6 Article

Fruit and vegetable juices and Alzheimer's disease:: The Kame Project

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 119, Issue 9, Pages 751-759

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.045

Keywords

fruit and vegetable juices; polyphenols; antioxidants; Alzheimer's disease; epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that oxidative damage caused by the beta-amyloid peptide in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease may be hydrogen peroxide mediated. Many polyphenols, the most abundant dietary antioxidants, possess stronger neuroprotection against hydrogen peroxide than antioxidant vitamins. METHODS: We tested whether consumption of fruit and vegetable juices, containing a high concentration of polyphenols, decreases the risk of incident probable Alzheimer's disease in the Kame Project cohort, a population-based prospective study of 1836 Japanese Americans in King County, Washington, who were dementia-free at baseline ( 1992-1994) and were followed through 2001. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratio for probable Alzheimer's disease was 0.24 ( 95% confidence interval [ CI], 0.09-0.61) comparing subjects who drank juices at least 3 times per week with those who drank less often than once per week with a hazard ratio of 0.84 ( 95% CI, 0.31-2.29) for those drinking juices 1 to 2 times per week ( P for trend < .01). This inverse association tended to be more pronounced among those with an apolipoprotein E epsilon-4 allele and those who were not physically active. Conversely, no association was observed for dietary intake of vitamins E, C, or beta-carotene or tea consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Fruit and vegetable juices may play an important role in delaying the onset of Alzheimer's disease, particularly among those who are at high risk for the disease. These results may lead to a new avenue of inquiry in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available