4.6 Article

Voice recognition and cross-modal responses to familiar speakers' voices in prosopagnosia

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 1314-1322

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj073

Keywords

fusiform face area; multisensory; person recognition; prosopagnosia; superior temporal sulcus; voice

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recognizing the voices of people we know does not only activate voice areas in the temporal lobe but also extraauditory areas including the fusiform face area (IFFA). This cross-modal effect could reflect that individual face and voice information become specifically associated when becoming acquainted with a person. Here, we addressed whether the ability to have individual face representations 1) plays a role in voice recognition and 2) is required to observe cross-modal responses to voices in face areas. We compared speaker recognition performance and neuroimaging responses during the processing of familiar and nonfamiliar speakers' voices in a developmental prosopagnosic subject (SO) with the respective findings obtained in a group of 9 control subjects. Despite scoring worse than controls on recognition of familiar speakers' voices, SO had normal cross-modal responses in the FFA and normal connectivity between FFA and the voice regions. However, she had reduced activations in areas that usually respond to familiarity with people. An indication for the malfunctioning of her FFA was reduced connectivity of the FFA to a subset of these supramodal areas. In combination these data suggest that 1) voice recognition benefits from the ability to process faces at an individual level and 2) cross-modal association of voices and faces in the brain is achieved by a sensory binding and does not depend on a top-down mechanism subsequent to successful person recognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available