4.1 Article

On adaptive learning rate that guarantees convergence in feedforward networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 1116-1125

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNN.2006.878121

Keywords

adaptive learning rate; backpropagation (BP); extended Kalman filtering (EKF); feedforward networks; Lyapunov function; Lyapunov stability theory; system-identification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates new learning algorithms (LF I and LF H) based on Lyapunov function for the training of feedforward neural networks. It is observed that such algorithms have interesting parallel with the popular backpropagation (BP) algorithm where the fixed learning rate is replaced by an adaptive learning rate computed using convergence theorem based on Lyapunov stability theory. LF 11, a modified version of LF 1, has been introduced with an.aim to avoid local minima. This modification also helps in improving the convergence speed in some cases. Conditions for achieving global minimum for these kind of algorithms have been studied in detail. The performances of the proposed algorithms are compared with BP algorithm and extended Kalman filtering (EKF) on three bench-mark function approximation problems: XOR, 3-bit parity, and 8-3 encoder. The comparisons are made in terms of number of learning iterations and computational time required for convergence. It is found that the proposed algorithms (LF I and H) are much faster in convergence than other two algorithms to attain same accuracy. Finally, the comparison is made on a complex two-dimensional (2-D) Gabor function and effect of adaptive learning rate for faster convergence is verified. In a nutshell, the investigations made in this paper help us better understand the learning procedure of feedforward neural networks in terms of adaptive learning rate, convergence speed, and local minima.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available