4.7 Article

Pineal clock gene oscillation is disturbed in Alzheimer's disease, due to functional disconnection from the master clock

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 1874-+

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-4446fje

Keywords

circadian system; clock gene; vasopressin mRNA; superchiasmatic nucleus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the master clock of the mammalian brain. It coordinates the peripheral clocks in the body, including the pineal clock that receives SCN input via a multisynaptic noradrenergic pathway. Rhythmic pineal melatonin production is disrupted in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here we show that the clock genes hBmal1, hCry1, and hPer1 were rhythmically expressed in the pineal of controls (Braak 0). Moreover, hPer1 and h beta 1-adrenergic receptor (h beta 1-ADR) mRNA were positively correlated and showed a similar daily pattern. In contrast, in both preclinical (Braak I-II) and clinical AD patients (Braak V-VI), the rhythmic expression of clock genes was lost as well as the correlation between hPer1 and h beta 1-ADR mRNA. Intriguingly, hCry1 mRNA was increased in clinical AD. These changes are probably due to a disruption of the SCN control, as they were mirrored in the rat pineal deprived of SCN control. Indeed, a functional disruption of the SCN was observed from the earliest AD stages onward, as shown by decreased vasopressin mRNA, a clock- controlled major output of the SCN. Thus, a functional disconnection between the SCN and the pineal from the earliest AD stage onward could account for the pineal clock gene changes and underlie the circadian rhythm disturbances in AD. Wu, Y-H., Fischer, D. F., Kalsbeek, A., Garidou-Boof, M-L., van der Vliet, J., van Heijningen, C., Liu, R-Y., Zhou, J-N., Swaab, D. F. Pineal clock gene oscillation is disturbed in Alzheimer's disease, due to functional disconnection from the master clock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available