4.5 Article

Evaluation of the mouse model for acute otitis media

Journal

HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 219, Issue 1-2, Pages 12-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.05.012

Keywords

otitis media; mouse; inflammation; Streptococcus pneumoniae; auditory brainstem response; middle ear

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC 05593, P30 DC005983, 2R44 DC005882] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various animal models have been employed for otitis media research. The mouse has been studied less, in spite of its many advantages. To better understand the suitability of the mouse for studies of otitis media, an evaluation was made of its middle ear inflammatory processes following inoculation with heat-killed Streptococcus pneumoniae (strain 6A), one of the three most common bacteria to cause otitis media in the human. A total of 94 BALB/c mice were injected transtympanically with three concentrations of heat-killed bacteria (10(4), 10(6), and 10(9) organisms per ml) and inflammation evaluated with both histologic examination and auditory brainstem response audiometry. Dose-related measures of the time course of inflammation showed it was maximal at 3 days. PBS-injected control mice also demonstrated some degree of middle ear inflammation. Therefore, inflammation measures from PBS injected mice were used as the threshold above which histologic inflammatory changes would be considered a response to bacteria. These quantitative comparisons of bacterial and PBS inoculations revealed the most significant middle ear measures of inflammation were amount of fluid in the middle ear, tympanic membrane thickness, and number of inflammatory cells. The induction of middle ear inflammation in the mouse demonstrated the applicability of this model for investigations of otitis media. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available