4.7 Article

X-ray galaxy clusters in NoSOCS: Substructure and the correlation of optical and X-ray properties

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 648, Issue 1, Pages 209-229

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505630

Keywords

catalogs; galaxies : clusters : general; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a comparison of optical and X-ray properties of galaxy clusters in the northern sky, using literature data from BAX and optically selected clusters in DPOSS. We determine the recovery rate of X-ray-detected clusters in the optical as a function of richness, redshift, and X-ray luminosity, showing that the missed clusters are typically low-contrast systems when observed optically (either poor or at high redshifts). We employ four different statistical tests to test for the presence of substructure using optical two-dimensional data. We find that approximately 35% of the clusters show strong signs of substructure in the optical. However, the results are test-dependent, with variations also due to the magnitude range and radius utilized. We have also performed a comparison of X-ray luminosity and temperature with optical galaxy counts (richness). We find that the slope and scatter of the relations between richness and the X-ray properties are heavily dependent on the density contrast of the clusters. The selection of substructure-free systems does not improve the correlation between X-ray luminosity and richness, but this comparison also shows much larger scatter than one obtained using the X-ray temperature. In the latter case, the sample is significantly reduced because temperature measurements are available only for the most massive (and thus high-contrast) systems. However, the comparison between temperature and richness is very sensitive to the exclusion of clusters showing signs of substructure. The correlation of X-ray luminosity and richness is based on the largest sample to date (similar to 750 clusters), while tests involving temperature use a similar number of objects as previous works (less than or similar to 100). The results presented here are in good agreement with existing literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available