4.6 Article

Tumor necrosis as prognostic indicator in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 3, Pages 910-913

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.019

Keywords

carcinoma; transitional cell; urinary tract; necrosis; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The clinicopathological features predictive of outcome in patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma are not clearly established. We analyzed the prognostic impact of tumor necrosis with respect to metastasis-free survival. Materials and Methods: The presence of focal (10% or less of the tumor area) and extensive (greater than 10% of the tumor area) coagulative tumor necrosis was retrospectively reevaluated in 268 cases of consecutive upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma and correlated with outcome. Results: Overall tumor necrosis was noted in 113 of 268 (42.2%) cases of transitional cell carcinoma with 63 (23.5%) showing focal and 50 (18.7%) showing extensive necrosis, respectively. Tumor necrosis was associated with high tumor stage (p < 0.001) and high tumor grade (p < 0.001). In addition, tumor necrosis was more common in pelvic tumors compared with ureteral tumors (p < 0.001). Actuarial 5-year metastasis-free survival rates for patients with transitional cell carcinoma with extensive, focal and lacking necrosis were 24%, 45% and 78%, respectively (log rank test p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis proved pT stage greater than 1 (p < 0.001, RR 6.04, 95% CI 2.82-12.93), high tumor grade (p < 0.001, RR 3.37, 95% CI 1.65-6.89) and extensive tumor necrosis as independent predictors of poor patient outcome (p = 0.02, RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.09-3.05). Conclusions: The presence of extensive tumor necrosis proved to be an additional histological variable with an independent influence on metastasis-free survival in patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Its assessment is readily applicable in routine sections and should thus be commented upon separately in the pathology report.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available