4.4 Review

A General Method to Describe Intersystem Crossing Dynamics in Trajectory Surface Hopping

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY
Volume 115, Issue 18, Pages 1215-1231

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qua.24891

Keywords

surface hopping; intersystem crossing; nonadiabatic dynamics; photochemistry; spin-orbit coupling

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25827]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 25827] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25827] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intersystem crossing is a radiationless process that can take place in a molecule irradiated by UV-Vis light, thereby playing an important role in many environmental, biological and technological processes. This paper reviews different methods to describe intersystem crossing dynamics, paying attention to semiclassical trajectory theories, which are especially interesting because they can be applied to large systems with many degrees of freedom. In particular, a general trajectory surface hopping methodology recently developed by the authors, which is able to include nonadiabatic and spin-orbit couplings in excited-state dynamics simulations, is explained in detail. This method, termed SHARC, can in principle include any arbitrary coupling, what makes it generally applicable to photophysical and photochemical problems, also those including explicit laser fields. A step-by-step derivation of the main equations of motion employed in surface hopping based on the fewest-switches method of Tully, adapted for the inclusion of spin-orbit interactions, is provided. Special emphasis is put on describing the different possible choices of the electronic bases in which spin-orbit can be included in surface hopping, highlighting the advantages and inconsistencies of the different approaches. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available